CENTRE FOR DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT ( GHANA CITIES MONITOR)
CENTER
FOR DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT (CDD)
THE
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT MEETING ON THE GHANA CITIES MONITOR PROJECT
Background
The Center for Democratic
Development (CDD) is an independent, not-for profit research and advocacy think
tank, working to advance democracy, good governance, and inclusive economic growth.
Some African cities including Ghana is said to be failing in serving as
catalyst for economic and sustainable development growth. Over the past decade
till now, some African urban population growth is on the rise and said to be
living in crisis. This crisis include; air pollution, disaster, poor housing, overcrowding
and health implications, as a consequence of the inability of city authority to
provide these services and socio-economic transformation. This was experienced
when COVID 19 emerged and there was weak capacity of city authorities to
respond to the pandemic like provision of health services in terms of
infrastructure driven some citizens out of the city centers to rural
communities.
Therefore, the engagement
meeting bringing together representatives like Kwame Oduro from Accra
Metropolitan Assembly, Ben Ofori- University of Ghana Institute of Sanitation,
Mamavi Owusu-Aboagye- Host for JOYFM and other attendees, was held on the 7th
August, 2023 at Fiesta Royale Hotel, to outdoor the Ghana Cities Monitor (GCM).
A project initiated by CDD, to measure the ease living in our cities and to
provide strong evidence for policy Advocacy of governance and the service
delivery in the urban areas. This monitoring was done in Accra Metropolitan
Assembly areas (AMA), Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA) areas and Tamale
Metropolitan (TMA) Assembly areas.
Objective of the Meeting
·
To give insights about the challenges that
are running in our urban spaces
·
To help inform policy decision- makers
like the Metropolitan Assemblies, implementers of the service provisions needed
by the citizens.
·
To encourage responsibleness and
accountability
·
To empower citizens to hold city
authorities accountable.
Introduction and
Remarks from Chairman
Prof. Abdul Gafaru, The
Associate Professor of the University of Ghana Business School acknowledged the
CDD-Ghana for harnessing the power of evidence-based research, ideas,
partnerships to encourage dialogue, inform and influence public policy.
Remarkably, CDD-Ghana deserves commendations for the initiation of this
project; ‘Ghana Cities Monitor’. The project is important because, cities are
expected to play the leading role of social, economic growth and
transformation. However, the reverse is the case, calling for strict monitoring
and tracking the experiences of people living in urban areas.
Methodology
The methodology includes
the tools like questionnaire, procedures used in collecting the data and how
the scores for each Metropolitan area in the various cities was computed using
formulas. For instance, the score for any metropolitan area is normalized to
run on a 0-100 points scale where the 0 is the lowest and 100 is the highest
score using the minimum and maximum scores of the sub-components. This was
applied for the major components and computed to get the GCM score.
Findings
The findings are the
graphical representation of the scores gotten from each Metropolitan Assembly
areas in the cities. For instance, the economic infrastructure which comprises
transportation, housing, water, electricity and communications, In KMA, the Transportation
score was 34.3, AMA 31.5 and TMA 24.4. Whilst Housing scored 49.4, 44.2 and
47.2 in KMA, AMA and TMA respectively. This was done to the other Components as
well.
Panel Discussion
The discussion was about participants
showing concern of their rights, development and how the GCM data figures have
meaning on policies. The conversation involved Mr. Farouk Braimah-Executive
Director for people’s Alliance for Human Settlement, Dr. Isaac Kwamena
Arthur-Director for Urban Management Studies, and the Moderator Mamavi
Owusu-Aboagye.
Contributions from
Participants
Kwame Oduro, the Planning
Officer for AMA chipped in with suggestions that, from the findings, the
researchers should have included the sub-metros districts like the
Ablekuma-South. The sub-structures that have been upgraded to the status level
in the municipal assemblies like the Ablekuma-West are yet to be upgraded in
the sub-metro districts. So, from the findings, researchers were comparing
municipalities to a sub-metro district, which makes it unfair, because
definitely, performance in the municipality will be higher than in the
sub-metros.
Concerning
accountability, Ben Ofori from the University of Ghana, said the laws are very
clear on that. The law, local government Act 936 L1 2232 talks about national
development planning and gives details on how leaders at the district should
account by engaging with the community and having general assembly meetings.
But the reason for its ineffectiveness is, funding becomes inaccessible making
frequency accountability unheard to the public.
Foster Osae Akunor from
the Ghana Institute of Architect added that, the findings were only made in the
metropolitan areas. But with the project name as Ghana Cities Monitor (GCM), it
should have included the entire boundaries of the cities to make the
assessments fully covered. Hence, in the next findings, researchers should
include those boundaries and see how the inhabitants are living sustainably.
For instance, knowing how pedestrians compete with the boarding of commercial
vehicles and how some have compiled themselves living in a wooden- structures
like ‘kiosks’ and the planning issues as to what extent will the research
effectiveness have on future generations.
The Executive Secretary
from Coalitions of NGOs in Health, Edward Owusu contributed to the various
graphical representations on the findings as, every finding serves as decision
support tools for duty bearers. This comes with budget and resource allocation,
so concerning the graphical representations like the Kumasi Metropolitan
Assembly which was leading in water score of 74.3, Accra Metropolitan Assembly
67.6 and Tamale Metropolitan Assembly 53.5 suggests that, when resources are
been allocated to improve developments, TMA will receive more of these
resources in terms of funds meanwhile, there may be other conforming defects in
the other assembly areas. Also, a lame person will generalize the whole thing
that, the one with the higher score needs higher service provisions. Thus, the
next finding should include the use of ISB PARAMETERS to serve as reference,
since one parameter may not be different from the other.
Mavis Asare Donkor from
the Ministry of Education also said the research should include client service
chatters. So that with this chatter, institutions will be invited either on
radio or television stations to define all the services they provide in that
particular institution, to ensure mutual agreement and understanding for the
citizens. Considering the fact that, some institutions struggle to provide the
services they are required of. This should as well come with delivery
deadlines. Hence, sensitizing citizens to hold institutions accountable if they
fail to provide their client chatter. This will in turn put them on their toes
to play their role diligently. For instance, “if a citizen visits the
passport office to submit his/her application documents and told to expect it
within fourteen days, that citizen should truly receive it within the
speculated deadline without delay”, she remarked.
Way Forward
Mohammed Awal from CDD-Ghana
commended participants for coming and added that, in ten to fifteen-years,
citizens who will fully relocate to the urban centers, there should be enough
service provisions to sustain them.
Comments
Post a Comment